Get a quote

Research Coaching for Graduate Students and Researchers

Most research projects do not stall because the student lacks ability. They stall because a vague topic never became a sharp question, a literature review turned into a pile of summaries, or a method was picked before anyone asked what it could actually prove. Research coaching is for those moments. It gives you one experienced person to think with while the project stays entirely yours.

Coaching here is done by one person, Ahsan Irfan, founder and sole editor of Help Me Bro. He works through your draft with comments and tracked changes, and talks it through with you in live sessions when a conversation will move you faster than a margin note. He does not write any of it for you.

Who this suits

Coaching works best when you already have something to work with, even if it is rough. It tends to suit:

  • Master’s and doctoral students who have a topic area but cannot yet state a researchable question
  • Students whose proposal keeps coming back from a supervisor with the same note: “tighten the rationale” or “justify your method”
  • Researchers with a literature review that reads as a list rather than an argument
  • Students with quantitative, business, economics or social-science data who are unsure which analysis fits and how to report it
  • Candidates preparing for a proposal hearing or final defense who want hard questions asked in advance

If your paper is in engineering or in medical or health sciences, say so when you ask for a quote. Those fields are outside what Ahsan can responsibly coach, and he will tell you plainly rather than take the work.

What coaching covers

Topic and research question

Many projects begin as a broad interest. Coaching helps you narrow it, test whether it is answerable with the time and data you have, and phrase the question so every later chapter has something to hold onto. You bring the ideas; the comments push on scope, wording and fit.

Proposal structure

A proposal has to persuade a committee that the question matters and that you have a workable plan. Feedback focuses on whether your problem statement, aims, rationale and plan connect logically, and where a reader will start asking “so what?”

Literature review

The most common weakness is description without argument. Comments show you where sources are merely listed, where a gap is claimed but not demonstrated, and where the structure could follow ideas instead of authors.

Methodology planning

Ahsan helps you think through whether your design matches your question, how to justify your sampling and instruments, and what limitations a committee will expect you to name. The choices stay yours, and you should be able to defend each one in your own words.

Data analysis support

This is coaching and checking, not doing the analysis for you. Ahsan can help you:

  • Choose an analysis that fits your question and data, and explain why it fits
  • Review output you produced yourself in SPSS, Stata, R or Excel and talk through what it shows
  • Understand what a result does and does not tell you
  • Comment on how your results are reported, including tables, wording and consistency with your method

His background is an MS in Finance, so quantitative, business, economics and social-science data are a natural fit. Clinical, biomedical and engineering data are not.

Defense preparation

In a live session, you present or summarize your work and field questions the way a committee might ask them: why this method, what are the weaknesses, what would you do differently. Afterward you know which answers were solid and which need work.

What Ahsan will not do

The project, the analysis and the words must be yours, so some things are off the table:

  • He will not write, rewrite or draft any part of your proposal, chapters, results or conclusions.
  • He will not run your analysis as a deliverable for you to submit, and he will not write your results chapter.
  • He will not invent, adjust or tidy data to produce a better outcome.
  • He will not help text slip past AI or plagiarism detectors.

If a request crosses one of these lines, he will say so and offer the coaching version of the help instead.

How an engagement runs

Coaching does not follow a fixed script, because projects arrive at different stages. In practice it usually goes like this.

You start by sending what exists: a half-formed topic, a proposal draft, a chapter, or a set of outputs you want checked. Through the quote page you share the file, the word count and your deadline, along with a short note on what you are stuck on. If a live session would help, say so there.

For written work, Ahsan returns your draft with margin comments and tracked changes in Word. Each comment asks a question, flags a gap or explains why something will trouble a reader. You then revise in your own words, deciding which comments to act on and which to push back on. Because you remain the author, the next version is always your own writing.

For live sessions, the agenda is set around your project: sharpening a question, walking through a method, rehearsing a defense. You can send a follow-up draft afterward, so written feedback and conversation feed each other.

Many students go back and forth between the two: a session to settle direction, a written round to test the new draft, then another session before a deadline or hearing.

Pricing

Written feedback on drafts is charged by length. Turnaround sets the rate: $25 per 1,000 words for 24 hours, $15 for 48 hours, and $10 for 72 hours. Live sessions are quoted once the scope is agreed, so you know what you are paying for before anything starts. The pricing page has the full picture, and how it works explains the general process.

Related help

Will you write my proposal or literature review for me?

No. Coaching means comments and tracked changes on a draft you wrote, plus live conversation. Ahsan points out gaps, asks hard questions and explains what a reader will struggle with. You do every revision, so the proposal and the review remain your own work from the first sentence to the last.

Can you run my statistics and give me the results?

No. Ahsan helps you choose and justify an analysis, reviews output you produced yourself, explains what it means and comments on how you report it. He does not run the analysis as a deliverable, write your results chapter or alter data. Clinical, biomedical and engineering data are outside his scope.

Which software can you discuss when checking my analysis?

He can talk through output from SPSS, Stata, R and Excel, as long as you generated it from your own data. The goal is understanding: whether the test fits your question, what the numbers show and how to describe them clearly. Quantitative, business, economics and social-science data suit him best.

What is the difference between a written round and a live session?

A written round returns your draft with margin comments and tracked changes, priced per 1,000 words by turnaround. A live session is a conversation, useful for choosing a direction or rehearsing a defense, and is quoted after the scope is agreed. Many students combine both over the course of a project.

Can you help me prepare for my defense?

Yes. In a live session you walk through your work and answer the kinds of questions a committee tends to ask about method, limitations and contribution. Afterward you know which answers held up and which need more thought. Ahsan does not supply scripted answers; you build them yourself.

Do you coach engineering or medical research?

No. Papers in engineering and in medical or health sciences are outside the scope, and Ahsan will say so honestly when you request a quote. Most other fields are fair game, with finance, business, economics and social-science projects being the strongest fit.

Tell me where your project is stuck

Send what you have, even if it feels unfinished, and say whether you want written comments, a live session, or both. I will tell you honestly whether I can help and what it would involve. Request a quote with your file, word count and deadline.

Related guides